[Expo-tech] Caves that don't exist even though we have survex files

Philip Sargent (Gmail) philip.sargent at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 22:23:01 BST 2020


OK,
(having looked carefully through cave-number-index and the kataster lists),

we have these directories in the :loser: repo with survex files in them,
but "the system" doesn't know that there are 'caves' of these names.

i.e. there is no corresponding directory in :expoweb:/1623/...
nor is there a corresponding  xml (.html) file in
:expoweb:/cave-data/1623...
for
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-04
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-05
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-06
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-07
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-12
:loser:/caves-1623/2009-01
:loser:/caves-1623/2009-02
:loser:/caves-1623/2010-06
:loser:/caves-1623/2010-07
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-01
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-02
:loser:/caves-1623/2010-04
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-05
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-06
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-07
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-08
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-12
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-14
:loser:/caves-1623/2012-ns-15
:loser:/caves-1623/2014-BL888
:loser:/caves-1623/2018-pf-01
:loser:/caves-1623/2018-pf-02
:loser:/caves-1623/2007-neu ;Moved to fixepts/misc.svx  
:loser:/caves-1623/gruenstein  *date 2012.08.08 ; Messteam: Uwe, Thomas
*title "Grünstein-Eishöhle"
:loser:/caves-1623/87 -- {yes I know. This one is on me.}

so 2012-ns-03 is fine and exists as 
:expoweb:/1623/2012-ns-03/
:expoweb:/cave-data/1623-2012-ns-03.html

but 2012-ns-12 doesn't.

These are presumably those which are waiting for kataster numbers, but in
the meantime we surely should have them "as caves" in the
http://expo.survex.com/caves list, or are they too small to be worth
bothering with? 

Since they don't exist "as caves" it looks like they don't exist "as
entrances" either. Which is a bit of a bummer as they won't appear on
prospecting lists (?) despite having been surveyed ?!?

So what "should" we do with them, and what will we actually do with them?
Philip






More information about the Expo-tech mailing list